Vietnam
is a densely populated developing country that has been transitioning from the
rigidities of a centrally planned economy since 1986. Vietnamese authorities
have reaffirmed their commitment to economic modernization in recent years.
Vietnam joined the World Trade Organization in January 2007, which has promoted
more competitive, export-driven industries.
By
the mid-1980-s, the Vietnamese economy was in chaos with inflation at 400
percent and widespread poverty. The country was on the brink of bankruptcy. The
government of Vietnam declared a set of economic reforms known as doi moi in
order to pursue market oriented economy. The situation improved and Vietnam is
now one of the world’s fastest growing economies, surpassed only by China.[1]
Foreign
donors have pledged $6.5 billion in new development assistance for 2013. Hanoi
has oscillated between promoting growth and emphasizing macroeconomic stability
in recent years. In February 2011, the Government shifted policy away from
policies aimed at achieving a high rate of economic growth, which had stoked
inflation, to those aimed at stabilizing the economy, through tighter monetary
and fiscal control. Vietnam's economy continues to face challenges from an
undercapitalized banking sector. Non-performing loans weigh heavily on banks
and businesses. In September 2012, the official bad debt ratio climbed to 8.8%,
though some independent analysts believe it could be higher than 15%.
Vietnam
recently become a significant player in the oil industry and appears to be
benefitting economically while developing a diversified economy.[2]
There
exists little evidence to suggest that money laundering is a major problem in
Vietnam, but the country has a substantial gray economy that makes the identification
of dirty money difficult. Vietnam, because of its geographical position, is a
transshipment country for drugs from the Golden Triangle together with being an
attractive target for overseas crime groups.
Vietnam
is not an important regional financial center. The Vietnamese banking sector is
underdeveloped and the Government of Vietnam (GVN) controls the flow of all
U.S. dollars in official channels. The nature of the banking system makes it
unlikely that major money laundering or terrorist financing is currently
occurring in financial institutions.[3]
In
addition, Vietnamese regularly use gold shops and other informal mechanisms to
remit or receive funds from overseas. Official inward remittances in 2005 were
estimated to be $3.8 billion while estimates are that double that amount came
through unofficial channels. Reportedly, an unknown percentage of transactions
in the informal remittance systems come from narcotics proceeds.
Article
251 of the Amended Penal Code criminalizes money laundering. The
Counter-Narcotics Law, which took effect June 1, 2001, makes two narrow
references to money laundering in relation to drug offenses: it prohibits the
“legalizing” (i.e. laundering) of monies and/or property acquired by committing
drug offenses (article 3.5); and, it gives the Ministry of Public Security’s
(MPS) specialized counternarcotics agency the authority to require disclosure
of financial and banking records when there is a suspected violation of the
law. The Penal Code governs money laundering related offenses.
In
June 2005, GVN issued Decree 74/2005/ND-CP on the Prevention and Combating of
Money Laundering. The Decree covers acts committed by individuals or
organizations to legitimize money or property acquired from criminal
activities. The Decree applies to banks and non-banking financial institutions.
The State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) and the MPS take primary responsibility for
preventing and combating money laundering. The decree does not cover
counterterrorist finance. SBV supervises and examines financial institutions
for compliance with anti-money laundering/counter terrorist financing
regulations. Financial institutions are responsible for knowing and recording
the identity of their customers.
The
2005 Decree on Prevention and Combating Money Laundering provides for
provisional measures to be applied to prevent and combat money laundering.
Those measures include 1) suspending transactions; 2) blocking accounts; 3)
sealing or seizing property; 4) seizing violators of the law; and, 5) taking other
preventive measures allowed under the law.
The
2005 Decree also provides for the establishment of an Anti-Money Laundering
Information Center within the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV). This center will
function as the sole body to receive and process information. It will have the
right to request concerned agencies to provide informationand records for
suspected transactions. The Governor of the SBV will appoint senior officials
of the center. The center is awaiting final approval from the Government before
it can be formallyestablished. SBV acts as the sole agency responsible for
negotiating, concluding and implementing international treaties and agreements
on exchange of information on transactions related to money laundering. SBV is
seeking donors’ assistance to strengthen its supervision capabilities in the
context of Vietnam integrating into the world economy.
In
October 2010, the Government of Vietnam (GOV) made a high- level political
commitment and adopted an action plan to address its strategic anti-money
laundering /counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) deficiencies. In March 2011,
Vietnam’s Prime Minister issued a
decision that set out a revised action plan to adequately criminalize money laundering and terrorist
financing, establish adequate procedures
to identify and freeze terrorist assets,
improve the AML/CFT supervisory framework, enhance customer due diligence and reporting, and strengthen
international cooperation. A second
draft of the AML law, intended to address significant deficiencies, is now
under review but fails to address the legal deficiencies that preclude the
comprehensive criminalization of money laundering. The draft AML law is
allegedly defective as it includes only preventative measures and not
enforceable obligations with penalties for criminal offenses.
The
amended AML provisions of the Penal Code took effect on January 1, 2010. These
provisions define money laundering as an independent criminal offense. However,
they do not meet current international standards, with deficiencies that
include a very high burden of proof (essentially, a confession) to pursue money
laundering allegations. Consequently, prosecutions are non-existent and
international cooperation is extremely difficult.
This
difficulty is compounded by the lack of administrative regulations providing
guidance on implementation. The Penal Code also does not include a definition
of ‘property’ that is in line with international standards and therefore limits
the offense for money laundering.
Additionally, legal persons are not subject to criminal liability under the
Penal Code. Vietnam currently has no plans to impose criminal liability on
legal persons because of perceived conflicts with fundamental principles of
domestic law.
[1] Andrew McGregor,
Southeast Asian Development (Routledge 2008) 56
[2] Andrew McGregor,
Southeast Asian Development (Routledge 2008) 202
[3]
However, a “drug economy” does exist in Vietnam’s informal financial system.
Vietnam has a large “shadow economy,” in which U.S dollars and gold are the
preferred currency. Due to the limited size of Vietnam’s banking system and
currency exchange controls, even legitimate businesses carry on transactions in
this “shadow economy.”
No comments:
Post a Comment